{"id":59,"date":"2005-07-28T13:21:49","date_gmt":"2005-07-28T17:21:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sorocabana.net\/wp\/?p=59"},"modified":"2005-07-28T13:21:49","modified_gmt":"2005-07-28T17:21:49","slug":"not_that_there","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sorocabana.net\/thoughts\/2005\/07\/not_that_there\/","title":{"rendered":"Not that there is anything wrong with being one&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Where is Jerry Seinfeld when you need him?<br \/>\n<a title=\"CNN.com - Roberts documents reveal a conservative - Jul 27, 2005\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2005\/POLITICS\/07\/27\/roberts.documents\/index.html\">CNN.com &#8211; Roberts documents reveal a conservative &#8211; Jul 27, 2005<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n<strong>Limiting Supreme Court&#8217;s reach<\/strong><br \/>\nRoberts argued that Congress had the power to limit the Supreme Court&#8217;s appellate jurisdiction on controversial issues, like abortion, busing and school prayer &#8212; but advised that doing so would be &#8220;bad policy,&#8221; according to recently released memos.<br \/>\nA document dated April 12, 1982 shows that Roberts disagreed with the view of then-Assistant Attorney General Ted Olson that Republican legislation in Congress to limit such jurisdiction faced constitutional problems.<br \/>\nThe Justice Department later sent a letter to the Senate and House Judiciary committees, concluding that Congress not curtail the high court&#8217;s jurisdiction, the documents show.<br \/>\nThree years later, in a memo to his boss in the White House counsel&#8217;s office, Fred Fielding, Roberts would still argue that the Senate bill to stop the Supreme Court from hearing challenges to voluntary school prayer laws was constitutional.<br \/>\nBut he also advised that the Justice Department not reverse course and to &#8220;let sleeping dogs (an apt reference, given my view of the opinion) lie,&#8221; he wrote.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Where is Jerry Seinfeld when you need him? CNN.com &#8211; Roberts documents reveal a conservative &#8211; Jul 27, 2005 Limiting Supreme Court&#8217;s reach Roberts argued that Congress had the power to limit the Supreme Court&#8217;s appellate jurisdiction on controversial issues, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sorocabana.net\/thoughts\/2005\/07\/not_that_there\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-just-rants"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sorocabana.net\/thoughts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sorocabana.net\/thoughts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sorocabana.net\/thoughts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sorocabana.net\/thoughts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sorocabana.net\/thoughts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.sorocabana.net\/thoughts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sorocabana.net\/thoughts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sorocabana.net\/thoughts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sorocabana.net\/thoughts\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}